【转】四路AMD Radeon R9 Fury X VS 四路GTX TITAN X

包子侯爵

Title：AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Quad CF Versus Nvidia Geforce GTX TITAN X Quad SLI 4K ‘UHD’ Benchmarks
From：http://wccftech.com/amd-radeon-r ... sli-uhd-benchmarks/

Every time the flagship GPUs from both sides launch, people are on the lookout for benchmark comparisons. But perhaps nothing screams the ultimate showdown as much as not one, not two but four Nvidia GTX TITAN-X’s and four AMD Radeon R9 Fury X going head to head in a 4K (dare I say it) battle to the death. The benchmarks have been provided courtesy of DGLee over at IYD.KR.

每次双方的旗舰GPU的发布，人们都在寻找基准测试来比较两者。但是也许令人惊讶的并不是一块两块卡来比，而是四块Nvidia GTX TITAN-X  VS AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 在4K模（zuo）式（si）下进行。该基准测试由IYD.KR的DGLee提供。

Four TITAN-X’s and 980 Tis face down Four R9 Fury in the ultimate 4K benchmarking round

四路TITAN-X和 980 Ti  VS 四路 R9 Fury进行4K终极基准测试

Allow me to indulge myself this one time. Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Four, Four, Four, 4! On one side of the ring, hailing from parts unknown and shrouded in Red, we have the mysterious AMD Radeon R9 Fury X.  On the other side, the defending champion, the king of Green, the Nvidia Geforce GTX TITAN-X. The arena is 4K and the name of the games are given below. Now that I am done being childish, given below are the specifications of the test system used to run the benchmarks

请允许我放纵一次。雷迪森和乡亲们，让我们热烈欢迎，四，四，四，4！（重要的四要说4遍）环的一个侧是来自充满红色欢呼的神秘的AMD Radeon R9 Fury X。另一侧是来自卫冕冠军，绿王Nvidia Geforce GTX TITAN-X。现在开始进行下列4K 和游戏测试。现在请允许我的幼稚，下面是测试环境：

CPU: Intel Core i7 5960X Extreme Edition (3.5Ghz Turbo)
RAM: 8GB DDR4 2400 Mhz/
Motherboard: ASUS Rampage V Extreme
OS: Windows 8.1 Pro
Driver AMD: Catalyst 15.15 beta
Driver Nvidia: Geforce 353.30 WHQL

Since DGLee is using Windows 8.1 OS, we are stuck with DirectX 11 and I think our readers with agree with me here that this rig leaves no room for CPU bottlenecks. With one of the most powerful processors known to man, rocking 16 threads, this processor has all the overhead necessary for running 4 GPUs at once (not to mention the required PCI-e lanes). At any rate, even if there is CPU bottlenecking to any significant degree, since both cards will be tested on this system, the test is scientifically correct. Without any further ado given below are the benchmarks starting with 4K:

鉴于DGLee用的是Windows 8.1系统，我们会坚持使用DirectX 11，我认为我们的读者也会同意我充分释放CPU的性能，所以我们使用了现在最强大的处理器（家用系列吧），16线程，这个处理器拥有4个GPU所需的条件（不用在意PCI-E通道（你不说我也知道有40条，x16+x8+x8+x8））无论如何，即使有CPU上的瓶颈也不会太明显，因为两种卡都会在相同的平台上进行。测试是科学的，开始的4K测试都没有什么压力：

Something very interesting is happening in these 4K benchmarks. When running a single card, the Geforce GTX TITAN-X takes the lead, whileas the GTX 980 Ti and the Radeon R9 Fury X are exactly head to head. Upon adding one more graphic card to the mix, the GTX 980 Ti falls behind. Out of the TITAN-X and the R9 Fury X, the latter gains the lead. In both Triple and Quad configurations, the Fury X easily pulls ahead, putting as much as 15% (overall) difference between the green counterparts. Take a look now, at the the Quad HD standard (2560×1440):

Here, there is quite a big difference between the green team and the red team. The R9 Fury X is behind by 7 percent to the GTX 980 Ti and almost 10% to the GTX TITAN-X. Upon adding another card, the Fury X pulls up with the 980 Ti while as the TITAN-X enjoys a lead of 2%. Just like before the Fury X scales better in Triple and Quad configurations but the difference is slightly less this time. Finally, here is the overall result of the 1080p standard:

这里（单卡），在红绿队友显著的差异R9 Fury X落后GTX 980 Ti 7%，落后GTX TITAN-X 10%。加了一张卡（双卡）以后，R9 Fury X和GTX 980 Ti 打平，落后GTX TITAN-X 仅2%。与之前Fury X在三卡和四卡缩放中表现好不同，这次表现略差。最后是1080p的总体成绩“

At 1080p, the R9 Fury is approximately 13% overall behind the TITAN-X and the green counterparts maintain their lead as the Crossfire or SLI scales with approximately the same aggregate performance in Quad SLI/CF. Something very interesting happened in these benchmarks. For one thing, we know that the Radeon R9 Fury scales much better than the Geforce counterparts upto and including Quad Crossfire, while as the TITAN-X and the 980 Ti only scale well up to Dual SLI.
We also see that in FHD and QHD Nvidia’s GPUs have a distinct advantage in Single and Dual GPU Configurations, while as in 4K the advantage goes to AMD. Of course one thing you have to realize is that the above benchmarks are aggregated and if you want a more detailed idea then looking at individual benchmarks is a must. Since not all games have the same optimization for both IHVs, adding them all together will result in a high margin of error. There are some titles where the R9 Fury sweeps the floor with green mops and some where the opposite is true. Therefore, the only safe thing to say would be: Both offerings exchange blows, resulting in what could only be called, dead heat. If you want to investigate more into the matter, here are the individual and detailed benchmarks:

在1080p成绩中，R9 Fury落后Titan-x大约13%，而绿队和红队的CF或SLI的总体性能基本相同。在这些基准测试中有些有意思的事。一方面，我们知道Radeon R9 Fury 缩放会比Geforce系列好，包括四路CF，而TITAN-X和980 Ti只能很好的支持到双路SLI。我们也能看到在FHD和QHD中，单或双的Nvidia GPU优势明显，而在4K下，优势转向AMD。当然你必须意识到以上基准只是汇总内容，如果你先看更详细的内容，必须看独立评测。因为两家的游戏优化并不一样，所以把他们放在一起会导致相差将为悬殊。有些是R9 Fury横扫，而有些又是绿队占据，情况正好相反。所以，唯一能打包票的是：两者PK，结果是——热死。如果你想了解更多，以下是独立测试：

Ecthellin

4个furyX肯定不会比ttx更热啦

冶天

交火抵消了面对隔壁单卡的不足？

包子侯爵

冶天 发表于 2015-7-13 00:09
交火抵消了面对隔壁单卡的不足？

所以fury非4k，单卡肛不过绿已成事实_(:_」∠)_

冶天

包子侯爵 发表于 2015-7-13 00:56
所以fury非4k，单卡肛不过绿已成事实_(:_」∠)_

那和我之前乱水的一样呀 单芯要规模的 双芯是超规模的 而不是优化 还兼容别家 交火的4K双芯 一直是小A 很平衡的频率和规格 整个FURY X 根本没有89亿晶体管 要扣除供电 布线和HBM 又说是放大镜基板限制 实际上应该还必须增加晶体管数量 做不到 如果把GCN拆成或者扩展出 核心内部交火 说不定可以解决一些问题 但又会觉得不如单芯 所以还是要加调度 分配 晶体管 才能满足 功能区占地面积有不少 其实也可以分离 交给CPU或者使用通用计算或者APU CPU不能差了 因为应用没转移到HSA 或者多核CPU和多SP的新算法 @Radeon @幽幽子

WzHua

如果这样的话，就要看到时他们的价格入手了

幽幽子

四路cf或者sli还是太脱离实际了。
单卡完美4K的时代何时才能来……